A couple of well-known characterizations from Horace come from so it first satire. The first typifies his facetious manner: “ridentem dicere verum / quid vetat” (What is incorrect which have anyone chuckling as they be truthful? Seated. 1.step one.24-25). Another signals the bill and you may moderation one draw their work overall: “est modus during the rebus, sunt certi denique fees and penalties / quos super citraque nequit consistere anal area” (you will find a middle floor inside some thing; you’ll find, eventually, unique borders, on the both sides of which Correct is unable to get a great stay, Sat. 1.step 1.106-107).
step one.2) and relationship (Sat. 1.3), train the brand new poet’s interest in Hellenistic ethical consider. The second mentions Philodemus, a well known Epicurean philosopher. Horace ridicules and you may dismisses followers of your doctrines out of Chrysippus, the head of your Stoic university inside the third millennium BCE (Sat. step one.3.127), including Fabius (Seated. step one.step 1.14; step 1.dos.134) and you can Crispinus (Sat. step one.step one.step one20; step one.3.step one39; 1.4.14). The third satire criticizes Stoic tenets such as for instance all of the failings are equal; justice is actually pure, perhaps not normative; and only brand new wise kid is great. The fresh new poem supporters a shared and you can caring invited out-of failings certainly household members unlike a rigorous stoicism.
The book overall try a testimony to Horace’s friendship with Maecenas. 繼續閱讀 The next and you may third satires, similarly discursive solutions out-of sex (Seated